News about control system security incidents that you might see in the not too distant future. Any similarity to real people, places or things is purely imaginary.
Saturday, August 8, 2020
Court Orders ECS-CERT to Withdraw Alert
CI-SOC Opened
Monday, August 3, 2020
US Cybersecurity Executive and Chinese CFO Both Released
Today simultaneous announcements were made by the governments
of Singapore and Canada that the extradition cases against Dade Murphy of
Dragonfire Cyber and Sabrina Meng of Huawei Technologies had been dismissed.
Officials in both countries denied that there was any connection between the
two cases. Both governments maintained that each of the cases had been dropped
as a matter of local statutory requirements.
Meng had been arrested in December of 2018 on a US extradition
warrant. Murphy was
arrested in June of this year on a Chinese warrant for computer hacking.
Johnathan Quest, spokesperson for the Federal Bureau of
Inquiry, said that there is still an active warrant out for the arrest of Meng.
He refused to comment on the Canadian denial of extradition.
A spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Justice refused to
comment on the case against Murphy.
Nelson T. Johnson, spokesperson for the US State Department
told reporters in today’s daily briefing that there had been no negotiations
with the Chinese about the two cases.
Kate Libby at Dragonfire Cyber issued a corporate statement
that said: “We are happy to hear that the extradition proceedings in Singapore
have ended and look forward to having Dade return home. We expect for him to
arrive here on a private jet from Singapore tomorrow or the next day.”
CAUTIONARY NOTE: This is a future news
story –
Saturday, August 1, 2020
Ransomware Re-infected from Sensor
Dragonfire Cyber published a report today on a recent
ransomware attack on a PLC being used in a safety system at a Louisiana
chemical manufacturing plant. There were two unique things about this
ransomware attack, the report states. First the ransomware did not encrypt system
files, it simply shutdown the safety system and demanded a 100-bitcoin ransom. The
second item of interest is that the system was re-infected as soon as the affected
PLC was released.
The active portion of the ransomware reset the Robotron SicherheitsKontrolle
PLC to factory default settings, erasing the programming designed to ensure that
the styrene storage tank remained in an inherently safe state. It also erased
the control screen on the HMI used by the safety system, replacing the virtual
system diagram with the ransomware message.
Since the affected system was a safety system, the facility
had a preprogramed replacement on hand for both the PLC and the HMI. As soon as
the ransomware message was reported, maintenance personnel were contacted and
the two devices were replaced within an hour.
“The attackers understood how easy it was to replace the
affected devices without resorting to paying the ransom,” Kate Libby, spokesperson
for Dragonfire, told this reporter; “So they designed their ransomware system
so that it would immediately infect the replaced equipment.”
The local control system maintenance personnel were not able
to find the initial source of the infection or the re-infection. In order to
ensure the safety of the facility, the company paid the ransomware and the
system was immediately returned to its pre-infection state.
Dragonfire was retained to discover the source of the
infection, determine how the system was re-infected, and ensure that there were
no other problems with the system. The source of the initial infection was the
USB that was used to apply the annual system updates for the safety system. The
USB, sent from Robotron offices in Germany, was apparently intercepted at the
local delivery company office and the infected with the ĀnquánShújīn worm.
The USB device was erased when it was removed from the laptop
used to update the PLC, but the technician who performed the update copied the
update to a backup drive for record keeping purposes. The drive erase program
was not transferred as it was hidden USB firmware. The malware programming on
the laptop was automatically erased and overwritten with the original update after
the safety system was updated.
“With a copy of the actual ransomware code on hand, it was
easy enough to track down the source of the re-infection,” Libby told me; “A
copy of the worm was moved to one of the smart sensors attached to the safety
system, in this case a Robotron DSensor”.
When the new PLC made initial
contact with the infected sensor, the worm reinstalled the malware on the PLC,
restarting the whole process.
Immanuel C. Securitage, spokesperson
for ECS-CERT, said that the malware seen in this attack was much more
sophisticated that the GUMMI BAREN ransomware that was seen
in earlier attacks on Robotron PLC’s. “Two years allows for a lot of
malware advancement,” IC Securitage told this reporter; “We also suspect that
there may be a State actor involved which also allows for an entirely different
level of sophistication.”
The Federal Bureau of Inquiry is reportedly
investigating if this incident is the work of the NoReturn group that has been causing
problems at a number of chemical companies in the United States. Johnathan
Quest refused to comment on that portion of the ongoing investigation, saying: “We
are continuing to work with the facility owner, ECS-CERT and Dragonfire on the
incident investigation. We currently have no suspects, but we are talking with
persons of interest at the GHB Air facility in Shreveport about the Robotron
USB delivery.
CAUTIONARY NOTE: This is a future news
story –
Thursday, July 30, 2020
CyMoTrol Sues ECS-CERT for Libel and Slander
It was announced today that CyMoTrol, a German manufacturer
of industrial motor controllers, had filed a libel and slander suit against
ECS-CERT for information included in a recent control system cybersecurity
alert published by the agency. They are asking for treble damages and punitive
damages for publicly disparaging the cybersecurity measures used to protect
their motor controllers. The suit also demands that ECS-CERT disclose the
identity of the anonymous researcher, cYbrg0D, named in the Alert as the
researcher who identified the multiple vulnerabilities so that charges of theft
of intellectual property, unlawful access, and industrial espionage can filed
on that individual.
Wilhelm Pieck, spokesperson for CyMoTrol, said that last
week’s alert published by ECS-CERT contained out right lies, fabrications and
mischaracterization of device features that had already led to one customer
canceling a large order for the CyMo One motor controllers mentioned in the
Alert and calls from many irate customers. “ECS-CERT never talked with us about
the supposed vulnerabilities,” Pieck told reporters; “If they had we would have
explained that the supposed vulnerabilities were carefully controlled features
of the devices that improved service and increased production reliability when
used in a properly protected industrial environment.”
Immanuel C. Securitage, spokesperson for ECS-CERT refused to
talk about the pending litigation. He did, however, explain that the agency
stood behind the information in the Alert. “Based upon extensive information
provided by cYbrg0D, we stand behind the identification of the three
vulnerabilities outlined in our Alert,” Securitage told reporters; “And we
continue to suggest that device owners face the potential consequences we
described for a potential exploit of those vulnerabilities in a production
environment.”
Shortly after the announcement of the law suit became public
cYbrg0D tweeted “CyMoTrol has hard coded backdoors in all of their products and
software includes phone-home code to provide info to manufacturer.”
When asked about the TWEET® Pieck said “CyMoTrol maintains
remote access capabilities in their products for maintenance purposes as part
of our customer service program. This includes device reporting of anomalous
conditions. These are carefully controlled processes and are an integral part
of the service we sell. They are not vulnerabilities and do not provide access
to the devices to anyone outside of our organization.”
CAUTIONARY NOTE: This is a future news
story –
Sunday, July 19, 2020
Control System Ransomware Attack Shuts Down Chem Plant
Monday, July 13, 2020
Army ROWPU Hacked in Iraq
A thread on a logistics discussion board on REDDIT about a
water supply issue for a US Army unit in Iraq claims that a cyberattack on a
reverse osmosis water purification unity (ROWPU) employed by the 248th
Composite Supply Company caused it to stop functioning. Reportedly the Army has
had to provide emergency water supplies to the unnamed unit. The Army has refused
to comment on the reported incident.
The ROWPU is supposed to be a slightly modified version of
Robotron Wasseraufbereitungsanlage (WABA) unit. Robotron recently released a
security advisory for their WABA unit. According to that advisory there are
multiple vulnerabilities in the unit that could be remotely exploited. The
advisory explains that exploits could allow the unit to become over pressurized
and damage the filtration cartridges.
Robotron spokesman Erich Mielke confirmed that the WABA
advisory had recently been published on their web site. “The advisory includes
mitigation measures to address the vulnerabilities and Robotron continues to
work on updated firmware for the equipment,” Mielke said.
When asked if the US Army had been notified of the
vulnerabilities, Mielke told this reporter: “We published the advisory on our
web site. System owners are responsible for monitoring that site and taking
appropriate actions.”
Kate Libby, a spokesperson for Dragonfire Cyber, confirmed
that the Robotron disclosure process was fairly common in the industry. “I am
surprised that a military contract would not include a vulnerability disclosure
requirement for the vendor, but it could certainly happen,” Libby said.
When asked about the mitigation measures outlined in the
Robotron advisory, Ms. Libby explained that the generic mitigation measures
included not using the remote operation capabilities provided with the unit.
She noted: “It would be impracticable to stop using the remote operation
controls on a unit employed in Iraq. It would require keeping a person
stationed at the unit during routine operations in 120˚ daytime temperatures.”
CAUTIONARY NOTE: This is a future
news story –