Monday, August 31, 2020

Closed Hearing Looks at MedDevice Incident


This weekend the House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity Oversight held a closed, virtual hearing on the recent non-hacking case investigation initiated by CSA’s Critical Infrastructure Security Operations Center (CI-SOC). According to a press release from Chairman Richard Gil (D,NY): “We tried to determine if either CI-SOC or the Federal Bureau of Inquiry (FBI) complied with the restrictions imposed on the two agencies in the authorizing language for the CI-SOC. At this point it appears that they did.”

The hearing was requested by Ranking Member Tucker Watts (R,GA) who had expressed concerns about last week’s announcement from National Association of Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (NAISACS) that their member organizations would no longer be sharing threat information with CI-SOC.

“CI-SOC can only be effective if they receive support from the entire cybersecurity community. The free-flow of information between researchers, ISACS and the Cybersecurity Agency is essential if we are to successfully defend critical infrastructure from cyberattacks.” Watts said in a press conference early this morning.

Both Watts and Sen TJ Kong (R,GA), were instrumental in getting the CI-SOC authorization bill through Congress late last year. Kong has also expressed concerns about the fallout from the first incident response from CI-SOC. “We cannot expect the CSA to construct a Great Firewall around the USA, nor do we want it to,” Kong said by telephone; “We set up CI-SOC to allow CSA to provide small and medium sized businesses with security operations centers that their larger competitors are able to establish in-house, leveling the security playing field.”

Kong told this reporter that the Senate Select Committee on Cybersecurity would be holding hearings on the MedDevice situation in late September. “The FBI investigation needs to develop a bit more supporting information before we can draw any real conclusions about the effectiveness of the CI-SOC and its cooperation with both the private sector and the FBI,” he said.

A staffer for Watts told me that the Congressman’s office is starting to look at crafting legislation that would require ISACS to share information with CI-SOC. “We are working with both NAISACs and CI-SOC on language that both can work with,” the staffer, who was not authorized to talk to the press, said.

According to Gil, the Cybersecurity Oversight Committee will be holding an open hearing in the coming weeks to hear concerns from NAISACS and companies being supported by CI-SOC.


No comments:

Post a Comment